Hi,
Idlecreekgangpig came to our village to attack mossbros and mossbros_V2 today which is fine considering it is a PvP server but he then camped their home points and killed them a further 3 times. Please could you at least just temp. ban him because otherwise he will continue to camp our home points.
I was online earlier for the conflict. In this village of Davethebox and MossBros they have a rule board. After PVP has become a conflict a rule was added to the rule board. NO PVP. From what I understand, if you have a town or village you may rule out PVP. Idlecreek continued to kill them after the rule of NO PVP was posted. Now, this is not the first time we have had to deal with idle's schenanigans. He is such a nuisance to the server and has narrowly escaped ban for his many conflicts in the past. I think it's about time he got sent a warning that nobody wants to deal with this. If not a permanent ban, a temporary ban might suffice. He just needs to be sent a message.
(09-07-2013, 03:52 PM)Truz97 Wrote: [ -> ]I was online earlier for the conflict. In this village of Davethebox and MossBros they have a rule board. After PVP has become a conflict a rule was added to the rule board. NO PVP. From what I understand, if you have a town or village you may rule out PVP. Idlecreek continued to kill them after the rule of NO PVP was posted. Now, this is not the first time we have had to deal with idle's schenanigans. He is such a nuisance to the server and has narrowly escaped ban for his many conflicts in the past. I think it's about time he got sent a warning that nobody wants to deal with this. If not a permanent ban, a temporary ban might suffice. He just needs to be sent a message.
A rule for a town dosent go over server regular rules. If you havent setup a wall he cant jump over, or havent zoned it, its free to pvp there.
However the camping, still looking it up.
(09-07-2013, 03:44 PM)Davethebox Wrote: [ -> ]Hi,
Idlecreekgangpig came to our village to attack mossbros and mossbros_V2 today which is fine considering it is a PvP server but he then camped their home points and killed them a further 3 times. Please could you at least just temp. ban him because otherwise he will continue to camp our home points.
Idlecreekgangpig killed Mossbros twice, 30 blocks between first and secound time. Then Idlecreekgangpig was killed by Mossbros_v2.
He did not kill anyone three times, and he certainly did not kill two people. It says all that in the logs.
Overall, this is not camping, and read above for the future of the town, built a wall, or get it zoned if you don't like pvp.
Here is a copy of the logs:
Mossbros|idlecreekgangpig|276x0|ENTITY_ATTACK|map (xxxx.0,64.0,-795.0)|09/07/2013 16:28:57 CEST|idlecreekgangpig held their own ground with their diamond sword as Mossbros fell before them.
Mossbros|idlecreekgangpig|276x0|ENTITY_ATTACK|map (xxxx.0,65.0,-766.0)|09/07/2013 16:33:28 CEST|idlecreekgangpig feels no remorse for bashing Mossbros with their diamond sword
idlecreekgangpig|Mossbros_V2|261x67|PROJECTILE|map (xxxx.0,68.0,-863.0)|09/07/2013 16:55:55 CEST|Mossbros_V2 held their own ground with their bow & arrow as idlecreekgangpig fell before them.
Stop trying to get idlecreek banned, if he does anything worth banning he will be. Putting polls asking if people think he should be banned won't make a difference to whether he is, the only thing it does is make the person putting the poll look like more of an arse...
(09-07-2013, 05:14 PM)Boblobster Wrote: [ -> ]Stop trying to get idlecreek banned, if he does anything worth banning he will be. Putting polls asking if people think he should be banned won't make a difference to whether he is, the only thing it does is make the person putting the poll look like more of an arse...
Fully agree on that closing thread
(09-07-2013, 06:07 PM)Freddy705 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-07-2013, 05:14 PM)Boblobster Wrote: [ -> ]Stop trying to get idlecreek banned, if he does anything worth banning he will be. Putting polls asking if people think he should be banned won't make a difference to whether he is, the only thing it does is make the person putting the poll look like more of an arse...
Fully agree on that closing thread